Used and Waste Oil and Grease for Biodiesel

Some of the most environmentally friendly biodiesel feedstocks are used cooking oil and waste grease. According to the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standards Program Regulatory Impact Analysis, released in February 2010, biodiesel produced from waste grease results in an 86% reduction in greenhouse gases, compared to petro-diesel.

There are two general categories of waste oil and grease. The cleanest and easiest to work with is used cooking oil, also called waste vegetable oil or used fryer oil. This is edible oil that has been used multiple times in a deep-fat fryer. The second type is called “trap grease.” Restaurants are required to install grease traps in their drains to prevent fats and oils that go down the drain from entering sewer pipes. The grease in these traps can be collected to make biodiesel.

While oilseed feedstocks originate in rural areas, used oil and grease are urban resources. The processing costs for waste oil and grease are higher per gallon than the processing costs for virgin vegetable oil. However, the cost of the feedstock is generally low and sometimes free.

The main challenge to biodiesel production from used oils and greases is the high percentage of free fatty acids (FFAs) in the feedstock. Fats and oils are composed of triglycerides – three fatty acid molecules attached to a glycerol molecule. In used oils and greases, some of the triglycerides have broken down so that the fatty acids are separated from the glycerol molecule. These are called free fatty acids. These free fatty acids tend to react with the alkali catalyst in biodiesel production to form soap instead of biodiesel. This reduces the level of free catalyst and thus reduces the speed of the transesterification reaction. Soap formation tends to inhibit the separation of the ester from the glycerin and slow down the reaction. In addition, because the soap must be removed and discarded, more soap formation means less biodiesel.

Used grease with less than 15% FFAs is called “yellow grease.” Used grease with more than 15% FFAs is called “brown grease.”

Used Cooking Oil

Used vegetable oil collected for processing. Photo: Richard Wiswall, Cate Farm, Plainfield, Vermont.

Used cooking oil is not really a waste product. It is collected by rendering companies, purified, and used for animal feed supplements and other products as well as biodiesel.

A 1998 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory of 30 metropolitan areasfound that about 9 pounds of used cooking oil are generated per person per year (Wiltsee, 1998, p. 2). Given a U.S. population of 308 million, this translates into about 2.7 billion pounds of used cooking oil per year. It is not known how much of this is currently being used to make biodiesel. However, because there is already a market for used cooking oil, and because the supply is limited, diverting more used cooking oil to biodiesel would probably cause the price of this feedstock to rise.

Trap Grease

The term “trap grease” technically refers only to kitchen waste, not septic grease. However, sometimes trap grease is cross-contaminated with septic grease.

Trap grease is often considered waste. It is generally disposed of at wastewater treatment plants and landfills, although sometimes it is collected by rendering companies to be purified and sold for nonedible applications such as burner fuel.

A 1998 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory of 30 metropolitan areas found that about 13 pounds of trap grease are generated per person per year (Wiltsee, 1998, p. 2). Given a U.S. population of 308 million, this translates into about 4 billion pounds of trap grease per year. Because it takes about 7.5 pounds of trap grease to make 1 gallon of biodiesel, this works out to about 500 million gallons of biodiesel per year that could potentially be made from trap grease. To put this in perspective, according to the National Biodiesel Board, in 2008 the United States produced about 700 million gallons of biodiesel from all feedstocks.

Challenges to using trap grease for biodiesel production include foul odor, up to 98% FFA, contamination with food and trash, heavy emulsification, cold flow issues (trap grease is solid at room temperature), and water contamination. In addition, the trap grease collection system is disorganized and fragmented (Haas, 2010).

Despite these technical and infrastructure challenges, at least one firm, BlackGold Biofuels, has developed technology for the successful production of high-quality biodiesel from trap grease.

Converting Used Oil and Trap Grease to Biodiesel

When a feedstock contains less than 3% or 4% FFA, most people just add extra catalyst, let the FFAs convert to soap, and then remove the soap. From 3% or 4%, up to 10% or 15% FFAs, a common approach is to use vacuum distillation to remove the FFAs from the oil. Then the oil can be processed normally, and the FFAs can be sold as animal feed or esterified separately.

However, used cooking oil and trap grease can contain much more than 15% FFAs. These feedstocks need additional processing before they can undergo traditional alkali-catalyzed transesterification.

Acid Pre-Treatment

One way to deal with a high percentage of FFAs is to use an acid catalyst such as sulfuric or hydrochloric acid to convert the FFAs to esters, followed by an alkali catalyst to convert the triglycerides to esters. One problem with this approach is that the conversion of FFAs to esters causes water formation, which can cause soaps to form during the alkali-catalyzed process.

However, this problem can be overcome by using an acid pre-treatment process to reduce the FFAs of the oil or grease. An acid catalyst and alcohol are added and reacted, the mixture is allowed to reach equilibrium, and the methanol, water, and acid portion that separates is removed. Then, if necessary, more acid and alcohol are added, and the process is repeated until the FFA level is less than 1%. After this pre-treatment process, the reaction is continued with alkaline-catalyzed transesterification. Using this pre-treatment process results in fuel that meets ASTM specifications for acid value. For more information.

While the acid pre-treatment is effective in reducing FFAs, the acid can cause damage to metal tanks. Use tanks coated with teflon or plastic or invest in super-alloy tanks.

Another disadvantage of the acid pre-treatment is that extra methanol is required because methanol is added with the acid and then removed with the water/acid layer. This methanol becomes contaminated with water. To recover and reuse the methanol, a distillation tower is required to separate the water from the methanol.

This technique was used to set up a pilot plant in Nevada, Iowa, to process high FFA feedstock into biodiesel.

Glycerolysis

An alternative process called “glycerolysis” can be used with feedstocks containing more than 10% FFAs. This involves adding glycerin at 400°F and letting it react with the FFAs to form monoglycerides, a glycerol molecule to which one free fatty acid has been joined. These monoglycerides can then be processed using a standard alkaline catalyst transesterification process.

Waste glycerin from biodiesel processing can be used in this process.

Glycerolysis can be expensive because of the high heat involved, which requires a high-pressure boiler and trained boiler operator. Also, vacuum must be applied while heating to remove water that is formed during the reaction.

Another disadvantage is that the glycerin will also react with the triglycerides in the oil to convert some of them to monoglycerides. While this does not negatively impact the reaction, it means that more glycerin is required for the process, and therefore more glycerin must be removed at the end of the transesterification.

Solid Acid Catalysts

The use of solid acid catalysts is a relatively new technology in biodiesel production. Solid acid catalysts are packed in a canister. As a mixture of oil and alcohol flows through this canister, the FFAs are converted to esters. The advantage of this process is that the acid does not contaminate the oil and therefore does not need to be removed at the end.

However, a disadvantage is that contaminants in the oil such as water and phosphorus can foul the catalyst and prevent it from reacting with the FFAs. One solution is to install a guard column in front of the acid catalyst canister to remove contaminants from the oil.

Even with a solid catalyst, water is formed by the esterification reaction and will contaminate the excess methanol that is used to force the chemical equilibrium to give a complete reaction. To be economically viable and environmentally sustainable, this methanol must be recycled, which requires a distillation process to remove water.

Supercritical Reactors

Another option is currently under development for processing high free fatty acid feedstocks. This option involves performing the reaction under supercritical conditions (275° to 325°C and high pressure). At high temperature and pressure, the reaction does not require a catalyst, so soap formation is not a problem. Water also does not appear to inhibit the reaction. Both free fatty acids and triglycerides react easily, so there is no need to separate these materials before processing. In fact, even very low quality feedstocks can be processed successfully.

However, the high reaction pressure requires heavy-duty reaction vessels. The reaction conditions are so extreme that many side reactions can occur which produce undesired products. The formation of these non-ester compounds means that the final product will probably need to be distilled to meet ASTM quality requirements. In addition, another drawback is the extra energy needed to achieve and maintain the high temperature.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.